The Twix Paradox (2024)

Right? Left? Silos much? What organizations can learn from a candy bar advertising campaign and how they can avoid the same mistakes.

The Twix Paradox (1) By Katherine Beaty, CFE

Fifty-four years ago, in 1967, Mars Incorporated introduced the Twix candy bar in the United Kingdom. Twix consists of a “biscuit” applied with other confectionery toppings and coatings, most frequently caramel and milk chocolate.

In 2012, Mars released an ad campaign declaring to their customers that, “It’s time to decide. Which side are you on? Left Twix or Right Twix?” This humorous ad campaign spawned an urban myth about why there is a need for a left and a right Twix.

Left vs. Right Twix?

Allegedly, in 1922 Seamus MacDougal and Earl Mackenzie started the Twix company together; however, the two fought constantly, leading them to divide production between two sites and only partnering when it was time to combine them into a pack. While this is a humorous, clever, and successful ad campaign, it showcased to me what so many organizations struggle with: misinterpreted communication, internal infighting, and the creation of silos.

Cascades vs. Flows

Many disagreements between team members occur due to differences in their understanding of the meaning of words. It is not uncommon for people to draw different meanings to the same word and then argue about the meaning of the word rather than clarifying their positions by using more words. Words have the meanings we assign.

The Twix campaign illustrates this when it describes the difference between the right and left Twix bar. In the right Twix factory, caramel flows on the cookie, while in the left Twix factory, caramel cascades onto the cookie. While the words can be interpreted differently, they are stating the same thing: the biscuit is covered in a layer of caramel.

The disconnect starting with a breakdown in communication and the meaning of what is being said led to the creation of two factories producing the same product. The next evolution in the internal breakdown progression occurs over the manufacturing process.

Many different departments/business units within an organization follow their own set of procedures that work for them and their needs. For example, if you are dealing with inventory, you are more likely to have a very automated process that is strictly enforced and not conducive to special requests. However, if you are in sales, you most likely have a more labor-driven process that changes-based on client requests and needs. Often, anger and resentment occur when each department/business unit does not show respect or understanding for the other departments choice in manufacturing process.

Right, Left, and the Silos

Organizational silos in business terms are defined as the separation of different types of employees, often defined by the department in which they work. When a specific department is working efficiently, like a well-oiled machine, one would think this is an obvious plus for the business as a whole. However, when employees in one department fail to interact effectively and efficiently with those in other departments, business operations can start to suffer, resulting in lost revenue, decline in productivity, bottlenecking in processes and even turf wars between departments. In effect, these organizational silos can become huge barriers within a company and can be very difficult to break down once in place.

In smaller organizations, silos can be fatal to the company as infighting for resources consumes energy better spent on becoming successful. In addition, in these smaller organizations’ silos can form because of being forced to compete for resources. The extreme result of this type of behavior when gone unchecked in what allegedly happened to Twix: The factions within split into separate manufacturing plants that will not speak to each other, even though their goals are aligned.

Build a Bridge/Walkway Between the Factories

What can an organization do to prevent becoming split and divided like in our Twix parable? Start by building a bridge through the three Cs:

  • Cooperation: Stop blamestorming. Shift the focus to working together for the greater good.
  • Communication: Take more time to reach out and talk with each other and not just through technology (messaging/email).
  • Collaboration: Work together to find common solutions to issues.

This starts from the top down. Don’t repeat the mythical mistakes of Seamus MacDougal and Earl Mackenzie. Often these divisions occur from managers with good intentions who are focused on accomplishing their specific goals for their department but conflict with the goals of another’s department. To break this cycle, managers must have the vision that a free flow of information will help the entire organization. When people across the company have the same objectives, they are more likely to communicate better. Executives need to state these common objectives frequently, so they become part of the organization’s culture.

A unified vision of company goals will turn damaging silo mentality into a culture where there is division of labor and not a division of information and eliminate the need to decide which side you are on, Left Twix or Right Twix.

The Twix Paradox (2)

Vice President, Implementation|Tez Technology

Katherine Beaty, CFE, is Vice President of Implementation for Tez Technology.

The Twix Paradox (2024)

FAQs

Has the twin paradox been solved? ›

There is still debate as to the resolution of the twin paradox. Starting with Paul Langevin in 1911, there have been various explanations of this paradox.

What is the answer to the twin paradox? ›

The answer is that the paradox is only apparent, for the situation is not appropriately treated by special relativity. To return to Earth the spacecraft must change direction, which violates the condition of steady straight-line motion central to special relativity.

Does general relativity solve the twin paradox? ›

As we saw, the general theory of relativity, i.e. the general principle of relativity, was needed in order to formulate the twin paradox. It should then not be too surprising that we need the general theory of relativity also to solve the paradox.

Who is older in the twin paradox? ›

Since the twins' velocities stay the same, with twin B orbiting at a larger velocity than twin A (who is not moving at all), twin B is still younger. “According to Einstein's relativity theory, the time measured by moving clocks runs more slowly,” Abramowicz and Bajtlik explained.

What is Einstein's twin paradox? ›

In this supposed paradox, one of two twins travels at near the speed of light to a distant star and returns to the earth. Relativity dictates that when he comes back, he is younger than his identical twin brother.

Is time travel possible? ›

On our current understanding of the Universe, we could potentially travel into the future, but travelling into the past may well be a total no-no. The only remaining loophole is that the theories this is based on are incomplete.

What is paradox answers? ›

Paradox passages rarely have an argument (premises + conclusion). Instead, they usually present two seemingly contradictory facts. Your job is to understand how it's possible for both of those facts to be true despite this apparent contradiction. You're solving a mystery.

What breaks the symmetry in the twin paradox? ›

This problem is known as the twin paradox. The answer to this question is that for the astronaut to return to the Earth, he/she must change direction and thereby switch from one inertial frame to another, and that breaks the symmetry between the two observers.

Is time dilation real? ›

Yes, they most certainly are. They are both a result of what we measure—and what we measure is as real as things get. Time dilation is easier to understand: we can easily measure if, say, a fast-moving particle is decaying after a longer time than it would if it were at rest.

Has anyone disproved the theory of relativity? ›

An illustration of MICROSCOPE, a French satellite that performed an extremely precise test of Einstein's general theory of relativity. Scientists have demonstrated that Einstein's theory of general relativity is correct to a remarkable degree of accuracy, despite having been around for more than a century.

Is relativity theory still valid? ›

On 25 November 1915, Albert Einstein presented his general theory of relativity at the Prussian Academy of Sciences. This theory is still considered to be the most important idea in modern physics.

Does quantum mechanics contradict relativity? ›

The ELI5 answer is that that quantum mechanics is "digital". It is "quantised" (hence the name) which means it comes in discrete quantities. General relativity is "analogue" it deals with things that are continuous and not discrete.

Has the twin paradox been proven? ›

Despite many attempts that have been made to resolve the twin paradox, none of them have been successful. These attempts all resort to a single example, namely the standard version of the twin paradox, in which one twin stays on Earth and the other travels to a distance star and back.

What is the solution to the twin paradox? ›

The resolution is that one of the twins changes their frame of reference and the other doesn't, so there is no symmetry and thus no paradox. But physically the change of reference happens due to the acceleration that one of the twins must take.

What is the paradox of the doppelganger? ›

The central premise of the doppelgänger motif poses the paradox of encountering oneself as another; the logically impossible notion that the 'I' and the 'not-I' are somehow identical.

Is it possible to solve a paradox? ›

Sometimes, paradoxes are extremely difficult to explain away, and in these cases logicians can employ what I call the “detour”, where you admit that the paradox can't be solved on its own terms, but propose that some deep assumption about reality needs revising.

Can something go the speed of light? ›

Therefore, objects with mass cannot ever reach the speed of light. If an object ever did reach the speed of light, its mass would become infinite. And as a result, the energy required to move the object would also become infinite: an impossibility.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mr. See Jast

Last Updated:

Views: 6609

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mr. See Jast

Birthday: 1999-07-30

Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

Phone: +5023589614038

Job: Chief Executive

Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.