Charity Navigator (2024)

Impact & Measurement

Score

99

This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.

Assessments

Impact

Unscored

0%

of

Impact & Measurement

score

Measurement

99 out of 100 points

100%

of

Impact & Measurement

score

Full Credit

Partial Credit

The Measuring Outcomes assessment evaluates how well a charity tracks progress towards its mission's outcomes.


Displayed below are the responses provided by the charity for the Measuring Outcomes assessment. Each question is designed to address specific criteria, with responses eligible for full, partial, or no credit. Please refer to the

scoring rubric

for details on how responses are scored.


Selected program:

iCureCeliac Patient Registry

Program Planning and Design

29 out of 29 points

This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.

Charity leadership uses information collected to make decisions regarding programs

  • Agree, uses information collected to improve programs

Charity staff have training or experience in monitoring and evaluation

  • Agree, staff have experience working with monitoring and evaluation practices

Charity has documents and reviews how program activities lead to change

  • Agree, documents and reviews

Charity has researched program model before implementation in the following ways

  • Review of academic research
  • Consulted other nonprofits
  • Referred to the practices of similar nonprofits
  • Referred to the practices of government programs
  • Referred to relevant private-sector practices
  • Surveyed target population
  • Assessed ethical and legal compliance

Charity revisits how program activities lead to change

  • Agree, does revisit how program activities lead to change

Charity tracks program progress in the following ways

  • Tracks activities
  • Tracks outcomes and impacts
  • Tracks using timelines and milestones
  • Aligns plan with mission

Program Development

26 out of 26 points

This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.

Charity identifies program target population needs in the following ways

  • Consulted other nonprofits
  • Reviewed data from prior monitoring and/or evaluation
  • Conducted a literature review
  • Conducted interviews and/or focus groups
  • Conducted a needs assessment

Charity considers practical, cultural, and political needs and interests of those served by program

  • Agree, charity is responsive to practical, cultural, and political needs

Charity reviews the work whether similar organizations work on the same problem

  • Agree, reviews the work of similar organizations

Charity uses SMART Goals

  • Agree, identified Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) goals

Data Collection and Analysis

16 out of 18 points

This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.

Charity tracks program information in the following ways

  • Collects data before a program is initiated
  • Collects data during program implementation
  • Collects data when a program is complete

Charity collects programmatic information on those served by the program in the following ways

  • Identifies the number of those served by program
  • Collects demographic data of those served by program
  • Collects information about the quality of service from the target population

Charity collects and analyzes program information to determine results in the following ways

  • Generates summary statistics of key metrics
  • Compares results to data from major institutions
  • Conducts data analysis over multiple points in time to measure change over time
  • Compares programs results to programs that work on the same issues
  • Compares program results to different types of programs in the geographic area

Reporting and Distribution of Results

18 out of 18 points

This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.

Charity reports program results to key stakeholders

  • Funders
  • Staff and volunteers
  • Board members
  • Participants/beneficiaries of our work
  • Other organizations engaged in similar work
  • Findings are publicly available

Charity reports both favorable and unfavorable results

  • Yes, charity reports both favorable of unfavorable results

Use of Results

9 out of 9 points

This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.

Charity uses program results to inform future work for the following reasons

  • Sustain and secure funding
  • Inform strategic planning
  • Improve program operations
  • Understand the impact of their work
  • Inform how we create future programs
Charity Navigator (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rueben Jacobs

Last Updated:

Views: 5998

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rueben Jacobs

Birthday: 1999-03-14

Address: 951 Caterina Walk, Schambergerside, CA 67667-0896

Phone: +6881806848632

Job: Internal Education Planner

Hobby: Candle making, Cabaret, Poi, Gambling, Rock climbing, Wood carving, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Rueben Jacobs, I am a cooperative, beautiful, kind, comfortable, glamorous, open, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.